Conversation
🤖 Gemini PR SummaryNote: The PR title "Proximity Generators Definitions" is significantly narrower than the scope of the changes described in the summary, which encompass broader coding theory, polynomial lemmas, and refinement of the Johnson bound. Mathematical Formalization
Refactoring and Rigor
Proof Completion
Infrastructure
Statistics
Lean Declarations ✏️ **Removed:** 3 declaration(s)
✏️ **Added:** 38 declaration(s)
✏️ **Affected:** 7 declaration(s) (line number changed)
🎨 **Style Guide Adherence**There are more than 20 violations of the style guide. The violations are grouped by rule below:
📄 **Per-File Summaries**
Last updated: 2026-04-13 18:22 UTC. |
Build Timing Report
Incremental Rebuild Signal
This compares a clean project build against an incremental rebuild in the same CI job; it is a lightweight variability signal, not a full cross-run benchmark. Slowest Current Clean-Build FilesShowing 20 slowest current targets, with comparison against the selected baseline when available.
|
🤖 Initial AI review without external context🤖 AI ReviewOverall Summary: 1. TL;DRThe PR establishes solid foundations for linear codes and proximity gaps, but requires structural updates due to a mathematically inaccurate MDS theorem statement, multiple critical type mismatches in the proximity generator definitions, and an incomplete 2. Checklist CoverageNo explicit specification checklist was provided for this PR. The review instead focused on strict mathematical fidelity, type correctness, Lean 4 / Mathlib idioms, and proof completeness. 3. Critical Misformalizations
4. Key Lean 4 / Mathlib Issues
5. Overall VerdictChanges Requested 📄 **Review for `ArkLib.lean`**Verdict: Approved Critical Misformalizations: Lean 4 / Mathlib Issues: Nitpicks: 📄 **Review for `ArkLib/Data/CodingTheory/Basic.lean`**Verdict: Changes Requested Critical Misformalizations:
Lean 4 / Mathlib Issues:
Nitpicks:
📄 **Review for `ArkLib/Data/CodingTheory/ProximityGap/ProximityGenerators.lean`**Verdict: Changes Requested Critical Misformalizations:
Here is the corrected code for these definitions: def Condition {S : Type} [Nonempty S] [Fintype S] (G : Generator S ℓ F) (U : ℓ → ι → F)
(T : Finset ι) (γ : ℝ) (LC : LinearCode ι F) (x : S) : Prop :=
let v := Matrix.vecMul (G x) (Matrix.of U)
(T.card : ℝ) ≥ (Fintype.card ι : ℝ) * (1 - γ) ∧
Code.projectedWord v T ∈ Code.projectedCode (LC : Set (ι → F)) T ∧
∃ j : ℓ, Code.projectedWord (U j) T ∉ Code.projectedCode (LC : Set (ι → F)) T
def IsPolynomialGenerator {s : ℕ} {S : Fin s → Set F} (G : Generator (∀ i, S i) ℓ F) : Prop :=
∃ P : ℓ → MvPolynomial (Fin s) F, LinearIndependent F P ∧
∀ x : (∀ i, S i), G x = MvPolynomial.eval (fun i ↦ (x i : F)) ∘ PAnd for def IsMCAGenerator {S : Type} [Nonempty S] [Fintype S] (G : Generator S ℓ F)
(ε_mca : UnitInterval → UnitInterval) (U : ℓ → ι → F) (T : Finset ι) (LC : LinearCode ι F) : Prop :=
∀ γ : UnitInterval,
Pr_{let x ←$ᵖ S}[(Condition G U T (γ : ℝ) LC x) ] ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε_mca γ)(Alternatively, you can type Lean 4 / Mathlib Issues:
Nitpicks:
📄 **Review for `ArkLib/Data/CodingTheory/ReedSolomon.lean`**Verdict: Needs Minor Revisions Critical Misformalizations: Lean 4 / Mathlib Issues: Nitpicks:
|
No description provided.